Propensity towards a deforming spirituality-by Abraham Sudeep Oommen
Text: Exodus 32:1-6
‘Hijacking’ is a familiar term
for many of us. It means seizing the control of a person or an object for an undesired
function. The confiscation of Indian Airlines in Kathmandu in Dec 24, 1999 and the air bus in
09/11 has made this term a more familiar. Interestingly this word has not often
used for the last decade. But for the last one month, this term, in another
sense, has become a topic of discussion in Kerala. A catholic magazine of this
month labeled one of its articles as ‘Hijacking the Christ’. The vanishing of
Christ’s face from the Da Vinci’s last
supper and the appearance of Christ’s picture in a so called traditional atheist political
party meeting may have influenced the
author to work on this title. But this incident should make us to think whether
we, as Christians, have hijacked Jesus Christ. Are we following the person and
work of Jesus who lived in the first century Palestine? Are we following the ethical
values upheld by Jesus? One of the portraits in the quarters of my theology
professor reads like this “O God, save us from your followers”. I think this thought
has originated from the hearts of a person who feel Christians as the hijackers
of Christ.
The passage also depicts the
hijacking of YHWH by the people of Israel. The passage begins with a
confusion of the people of Israel
due to the absence of Moses. The people were ashamed and impatient on the
non-responsiveness from the Mount Sinai. As a
result they approached Aaron and asked to make a god for themselves. I believe
that the expression ‘make us a God who can lead us through the wilderness’ is
one of the hardest phrases in the entire scripture. They didn’t search for a
God who revealed in their pains and pathos in Egyptian bondage, but tried to construct
a god who is adaptable with their needs. They are not asking for a god who lead
them through the wilderness but for a god whom they can handle.
There may be many reasons that
made Israelites to demand the need of a constructed god. The life in Egypt was a
static one which is contrary to the exodus journey which involves dynamic
events like red sea, desert, Marah, wars and so on. They may be fed up with the
adventurous journey through the desert which awards these unexpected events to
them. They failed to see the works and providence of YHWH in their risky
journeys. The transition in the social status of the people may have also compelled
them to demand for a ‘god with handles’. The shift from cucumber to manna, from
bondage to freedom has made them to think for an alternate God. May be the need
for a symbol or an icon has made them for demand for a God. Unlike Israelites,
the other people had many cultic symbols to denote their success, fertility. So
it may be a need of the people to get a cultic symbol like that.
Whatever may be the reason; we
too believe and like to see this passage as the fault and flaw of the people of
Israel.
But often we forget or caused to make forget that all these incidents happened
by the orders of Aaron, the priest. The priestly presence which is often
considered as holy and serene had made the people to move and accept a deforming
spirituality.
When Aaron heard the need of the
people he asked them to collect the gold rings from their wives and children
and he fashioned it in to a calf which is the symbol of success and victory in
those times. He made an altar for its worship and announced a celebration. A
faith affirmation, “These are your gods, O Israel who brought you up out of the
land of Egypt” was formulated. Sacrifices were offered to the god. Feast and
festivals were started. Aaron who was
called to be the ‘tongue of YHWH’ has now become a ‘God maker’. The priest par
excellence has now become a compromising person.
Similar voices can also be heard
in the present day society. Many people in our times demand for a success
oriented, safety oriented spirituality which are often selfish motivated. Many
of them want a God which can be handled easily. In this context, we can see leaders
and priests who make god for selfish interests. Similar to this passage we too
can hear the interesting songs and interpretations of such people who try to manipulate
God for their vested interests. These ‘god-makers’ like the king-makers, are
the agents of a deforming spirituality. Kosuke Koyama, the well known third
world theologian, in his book, No handle
on the cross, explains the difference between technology and theology: “ The
basic difference with the technology and theology is that the former gives us both
an engine and a handle, where as the latter has an engine but no handle.
Theology does not aim to control the power of God. The theology that puts a
handle to the power of God is no longer a theology but a demonical theological
ideology.” The priests and leaders are called not to mould God but to mould the
life of people and drew them to more and more commitment towards God
The result of this inclination in
spirituality by the priest is well depicted in the passage. Unlike the
preceding chapters, Aaron is never called to meet YHWH along with Moses. His
office, as a priest was cut down to conduct some ritualistic cultic practices. The
people of God too are affected with this attitude. Instead of addressing the people with the
usual phrase “my people”, YHWH addresses them as the corrupted people and the
stiff-necked people. Moses breaks the two stone tablets which hold the
commandments. There is no need of a commandment
for those who never had a commitment to YHWH. Moreover Moses asks them to
fought within the community and kill their own brothers and sisters. It
symbolizes the destruction of a community in the absence of a God. Furthermore
YHWH sends plague on the people. In short, every attempt to manipulate God disturbs the relation
with God, nature and with the fellow human beings.
The priests are called to be the ‘bridge
makers’, the ministers of the word and the sacraments. Are we considering these
duties seriously? Rev.Dr.S.Jaganathan, professor of the department of Old
Testament in Gurukul Lutheran Theological college, Chennai, wrote in a devotion that Terrorism and
violence need not come with political rebels; it can come from altars and
pulpits with a sacred coating, it is more violent when it is oriented towards a
systematic marginalization of the helpless”. Does the voices from the altars
and perpetuates selfishness and success and comfort oriented spirituality? May our
almighty God help us to be effective ministers in the society.